Saturday 30 May 2015

What will EHRs look like in 2020?

In an article published online today in JAMIA, the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, an AMIA task force takes on the thorny issues associated with the use of electronic medical recordsystems and offers recommendations for improvement.

“Health information technology is a key part of enhancing health and health care, and empowering patients to be first-order participants in their care,” said Douglas B. Fridsma, MD, president and CEO of AMIA, in a statement. “As part of this report, we listened to our members who work closely with EHRs to understand the current challenges. We think these recommendations will improve the value that EHRs will provide to patients, and set the stage for more significant benefit in the future.”

Members of the AMIA EHR 2020 Task Force on the Status and Future Direction of EHRs are: Thomas H. Payne, Sarah Corley, Theresa A. Cullen, Tejal K. Gandhi, Linda Harrington, Gilad J. Kuperman, John E. Mattison, David P. McCallie, Clement J. McDonald, Paul C. Tang, William M. Tierney, Charlotte Weaver, Charlene R. Weir and Michael H. Zaroukian.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1dBNbrc



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1LUeg3p
via IFTTT

Providers in dire need of connectivity

Connected health infrastructure is emerging in healthcare as a binding agent for diverse devices and workflows, aiding diagnosis, monitoring and prevention, according to new analysis from Frost & Sullivan.

For such an infrastructure to be efficient, stakeholders must first ensure that interoperability and connectivity standards are in place, researchers write in in Healthcare and Medical Device Connectivity and Interoperability. They write that the adoption of a connected healthcare infrastructure is not uniform across the world. This is primarily due to the lack of a holistic digital healthcare strategy that focuses on integrated care models.

“More than 50 percent of healthcare providers do not have a healthcare IT roadmap, although they acknowledge the role of digital health in enhancing healthcare efficiency,” writes Frost & Sullivan Healthcare Research Analyst Shruthi Parakkal. “Consequently, even the existing interoperability standards such as HL7, DICOM and Direct Project are not being utilized optimally by many providers.”

Also, he adds, hospitals are often required to update processes and workflows through expensive upgrades and reviews of codes and software. This process becomes more complicated in the absence of vendors that can guarantee connectivity between devices from various manufacturers.

“Hospitals/healthcare providers have an urgent requirement for connected devices and health IT solutions not only to manage healthcare data, but also to qualify ‘Meaningful Use’ requirements and be eligible for electronic health recordincentives,” noted Parakkal. “Therefore, manufacturers of vendor-agnostic and open medical connectivity solutions are in demand, as they facilitate the integration of devices from different original equipment manufacturers.”

Alliances and gateways that harness interoperability and enable information sharing between devices and health IT solutions from different vendors will go a long way in augmenting connectivity. Meanwhile, technology advances in WiFi, Bluetooth, and radio frequency identification are also stoking market advancement.

The intensifying focus on healthcare interoperability in FDA guidelines is expected to add thrust to the development of the market for healthcare and medical device interoperability and connectivity.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1Ktqn74



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1cq2OjX
via IFTTT

Brookings’ Niam Yaraghi: US on the verge of realizing returns on HIE investments

A new paper from Brookings Institution fellow Niam Yaraghi examines why it’s so hard to measure the benefits of the government’s half-billion-dollar investment in health information exchange.

He finds continuing promise in effective data exchange, though he notes that establishing such organizations has been a rocky road for many despite the $548 million in federal grants awarded to states and other groups.

“After more than a decade of concerted national efforts, we are now on the verge of realizing the returns on our investments on health IT,” Yaraghi says. “HIE platforms have the potential to leverage the national investments on interoperability and radically improve the efficiency of healthcare services.”

He points to two conditions for successful regional health information organizations (RHIOs): the volume of available medical data and the extent to which its members access the available data.

Research from HEALTHeLINK, the RHIO of Western New York, attempts to address these issues. Two identical trials were conducted in two emergency department settings from Aug. 4-Sept. 26, 2014 and Oct. 20-Dec. 8, 2014, to assess the effects of querying the database of an HIE platform on the number of orders for laboratory tests and radiology examinations.

A group of medical liaisons accessed the RHIO and presented relevant information to the ED physicians. Those patient records then were compared with records of patients treated by the same physicians when the liaisons were not present.

In the first ED setting, researchers found a 25 percent reduction in lab tests and 26 percent fewer radiology examinations ordered when using the RHIO database. In the second ED setting, querying the RHIO’s database was associated with a 47 percent reduction in the estimated number of radiology examinations.

Yaraghi says studies on the effectiveness of RHIOs have mostly occurred during the early development stages of these platforms when few providers have joined; to that end, there has been little data available in the databases.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1Bxc38s



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1FTQCUq
via IFTTT

The Eyes Have It: Iran’s Health Minister Performs Surgery On Opposition Figures

Iran’s health minister has performed eye surgery on an opposition leader who has been under house arrest since 2011, the government critic’s son told RFE/RL.

Mohammad Taghi Karrubi, the London-based son of reformist cleric Mehdi Karrubi, said his father underwent a cataract operation this week in Tehran performed by Iranian Health Minister Hassan Ghazizadeh Hashemi.

The younger Karrubi told RFE/RL that Hashemi, an ophthalmologist, had examined his father’s eyes in recent months and promised to provide a follow-up consultation to the opposition leader after the surgery.The son said he did not want to read too much into the fact that a government minister personally treated his father, who remains under arrest for challenging the Islamic establishment in Iran.

“I see it more as [Hashemi’s] personal approach and personality,” he said in a telephone interview. “But the atmosphere inside Iran has also changed.”

Hashemi also reportedly performed eye surgery on another outspoken critic of the Iranian regime, university professor Zahra Rahnavard, who remains under house arrest together with her husband and fellow opposition leader, Mir Hossein Musavi.

“Mother’s eye was operated by Dr. Hashemi; no one from the family was there with her,” the couple’s daughter, Narges Musavi, wrote in a May 29 post on her Instagram account.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1cnz3QH



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1LQ7iNm
via IFTTT

Health IT Business News Roundup for the Week of May

M&A, Financial Reports and Funding

Xerox has acquired Healthy Communities Institute, a cloud-based public health data company, for an undisclosed sum…Grey Healthcare Group, a provider of health care communication services, has acquired a minority stake in PARx Solutions, a provider of prior authorization services for an undisclosed sum…Welltok, the developer of the CafĂ©Well Health Optimization Platform, has acquired analytics provider Predilytics for an undisclosed sum.

Quality Systems — a provider of practice management, EHR and revenue cycle management applications — has reported a Q4 2015 income of $10.7 million on $128.4 million in revenue, compared with a Q4 2014 income of $5.2 million on $115.2 million in revenue.

Jiff, an enterprise health benefits platform provider, has raised $23.3 million in a Series C funding round led by Rosemark Capital…Ovuline, a women’s health mobile application developer, has raised $3.2 million in a funding round with participation from multiple investors.

Contracts

Erlanger Health System in Tennessee has selected Epic’s EHR system…Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative, a partnership between the University of Michigan andBlue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, has selected ArborMetrix’s cloud-based analytics services…Health Quest, a health system in New York, has selected Health Catalyst’s data warehouse and analytics platform…the National Institute of General Medical Sciences has selected LCG’s IT infrastructure support services.

Product Development and Marketing

EHR vendor Practice Fusion has partnered with ePatientFinder, a provider of EHR clinical trial recruitment services, to develop an EHR-based clinical trial network…DataMotion, an email encryption and health information services provider, has joined the National Association for Trusted Exchange, an association focused on advancing health information exchange…theCleveland Clinic has integrated its algorithms for various specialties with Apervita’s data analytics community and marketplace.

Personnel

Susannah Fox — former associate director of the Pew Research Center and “entrepreneur in residence” at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation — will replace Bryan Sivak as CTO ofHHS…Jonathan Scholl, former chief strategy officer at not-for profit health system Texas Health Resources, has been named health and engineering sector president at Leidos Holdings, a health IT consulting firm…Eldon Richards — former executive vice president of product and technology atPatientPoint, a provider of patient engagement services — has been named CTO of Recondo Technology, a provider of cloud-based revenue cycle management services; Perry Sweet — former vice president of services, support and account management of Allscripts’ population health and community solutions division — has been named chief client officer of Recondo Technology…Peter Sheehan, founder of software vendor REPTrax, has been named vice president of sales at Apervita, a health data analytics provider.a

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1BwYuWA



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1BwYtlu
via IFTTT

Report: Health Insurer Humana Considering a Sale

Humana shares soared well beyond all-time high prices Friday afternoon on speculation that the company, one of the nation’s biggest health insurers, might be up for sale.

Analysts have been discussing for a few weeks the possibility that large health insurers flush with cash may be hunting for a big acquisition. Deal-friendly low interest rates and expectations for another wave of consolidation also are fueling the speculation.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that Humana is considering a sale and has received takeover interest.

A Humana spokesman did not return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment.

Louisville, Kentucky-based Humana is seen as an attractive target in part because it is the second-largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans, a key source of future growth for insurers. Enrollment has already grown briskly the past several years for these privately run, federally funded versions of the Medicare program for people over age 65 and the disabled.

That’s expected to continue as baby boomers become eligible for the coverage and as more companies drop retiree health benefits. The health care overhaul has chopped funding for these plans, but the worst of that has passed, and analysts see much less uncertainty in the future for the coverage.

In addition, insurers are gaining a better understanding of the health care overhaul, the massive federal law that has helped provide coverage for millions. They are learning that scale matters in terms of gaining negotiating leverage for rates over care providers.

“There’s got to be another wave of consolidation that occurs, and our view is that Humana would either be the first to go or be one of the first to actually make an acquisition themselves,” said Thomas Carroll, who covers the industry for the investment bank Stifel.

Leerink analyst Ana Gupte said Humana makes an attractive target in a sector “ripe for consolidation.”

“We think (Humana’s) Medicare Advantage business and capability makes it especially attractive to some of the largest insurers,” she wrote in a note to investors.

Aside from Medicare Advantage plans, Humana Inc. also offers commercial coverage as well as insurance for military members and their families.

The company’s stock rose as high as $219.79 during afternoon trading, blowing past its previous all-time high price of $183.05 in Friday afternoon trading. The shares finished with a gain of $36.24, or 20.3 percent, to $214.65. Shares of other major insurers like Cigna Corp., Aetna Inc. and Anthem Inc. also climbed while broader indexes slipped.

Managed care stocks have outpaced the market for a few years now, and the shares of several insurers have reached record high prices. Investors have been drawn by strong performances, fattened dividends and dwindling uncertainty about the overhaul’s impact on the sector.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1BuDNur



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1FKP3qu
via IFTTT

Taming twin public health concerns: tobacco, alcohol

The two most important causes of disease and death among adults in the world today are tobacco and alcohol. It is ironical that they persist in causing largest number of diseases and deaths despite their being preventable and public health scientists having highest level of research evidence on these two exposures causing disease and deaths among humans.

Notwithstanding the recent statements by some members of Indian Parliament, there is no doubt or difference of opinion on tobacco causing cancer and other serious diseases leading to deaths. Even the tobacco industry does not dispute the evidence. It still opposes and fights every tobacco control measure in every country but mostly on legal and procedural issues, rather than by questioning the evidence.

Considering the global nature of the tobacco problem and the transnational tobacco industry that is the cause of the problem, the World Health Organization, for the first time, initiated an International treaty, WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). The treaty came into force on February 27, 2005 and has proved to be a highly successful, having been ratified by 180 countries so far.

The FCTC lays down basic principles and legal framework for advancing tobacco control but the progress has not been easy. Every policy measure faces a great deal of hurdles from the vested interests – a case in point being pictorial health warnings (PHWs) on tobacco products in India.

Since 2007, every notification on PHWs has been delayed for implementation and diluted in the process – the most recent one being the delay in implementation of notification requiring 85% of principal display area of tobacco products to be devoted to PHWs that should have come into effect on April 1, 2015, but has been put in abeyance.

The issues with alcohol control are even more complex than tobacco control. Tobacco, although grown in huge quantity has no beneficial use for humankind unless one terms satisfying an unnecessary and harmful addiction as a benefit.

Alcohol, on the other hand, is indispensible in medical procedures, pharmaceutical preparations, industrial processes, even household applications. So for alcohol control policies, one can only focus on controlling human use of alcohol.

Any use of the phrase ‘alcohol control’ however, immediately gets connected to the failed experiment of prohibition in the USA during 1930s that had its roots in the temperance movement. Therefore the issue of alcohol control often gets connected to mortality and moral values. In India so far, partial prohibition of alcohol has been based on its harmful social influences rather than public health impact.

There is an urgent need to start thinking of alcohol control based on hard scientific public health evidence. In addition to traffic accidents, the research evidence that alcohol causes cancer at many different sites: mouth, larynx, pharynx oesophagus, liver etc. is unequivocal.

Yet other than tobacco, there is no cancer causing consumer product that is so freely and widely available. Compared to tobacco, awareness of alcohol causing cancer is extremely low and there are no warning labels on alcohol bottles or restrictions on their surrogate advertisements and promotions.

Another issue complicating alcohol control is a slight reduction in the risk of cardiovascular diseases when alcohol is consumed in small, in fact very small, quantity. Rather than negating alcohol control, this points out towards informing consumers on safe level of alcohol consumption for cardiovascular diseases – information that is completely absent from bottles and advertisement of alcohol.

To improve public health, it is high time that we start thinking about tobacco and alcohol control policies based on strict scientific evidence without being derailed by the vested interests.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1J9eRRf



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1FKJiJw
via IFTTT

Real-time analytics projected to help Covenant Health save nearly $2 million

A move to real-time analytics has Covenant Health, a not-for-profit Catholic health system with three hospitals in Maine and New Hampshire, on track to save a projected $1.8 million in 2015.

Covenant is in a unique position as a self-insured system–being the provider, the employer, and the insurer–Richard Boehler, a doctor and CEO of St. Joseph Hospital, one of Covenant’s facilities, tells HealthITAnalytics. While wellness programs and care coordination have been central to its efforts to improve care and reduce its costs, it’s found that having the latest information is key to its savings.

“[W]hen you do care coordination and population health management and more data-driven risk stratification, you are able to identify those individuals who are at risk of having a catastrophic problem,” Boehler says. “Or you’re able to identify individuals who are utilizing emergency services frequently, or who aren’t filling their prescriptions. They’re not getting their blood tests for diabetes checked on a regular basis.”

Covenant’s efforts include building a data warehouse as a repository, “but we also had to find a way to get it back in a timely fashion to influence meaningful change,” Boehler adds.

One of the challenges has been reassuring employees that their information is being used appropriately. To that end, Covenant has created a firewall that allows searching global information to look for patterns, but not drilling down to the level of the individual patient. Only the care coordinators and primary care physicians have that level of access.

Providing care coordinators with close to real-time access to admission, discharge, and transfer data has also helped patients to receive appropriate services after a hospitalization or a visit to the emergency department, he says.

Cleveland Clinic, which has built a structured data repository that sits behind the electronic medical record system, is focusing on making data useful rather than just interesting.

Secondary use of health information exchange data could be even more valuable than its primary use of giving providers a complete picture of a patient’s care history, according to research involving a data warehouse built in parallel to the New York Healthix HIE. A paper at eGEMS (Generating Evidence & Methods to Improve Patient Outcomes) describes issues that arose in harnessing that trove of data.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1QhzWI6



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1K0SYTl
via IFTTT

SIIM 2015: Top 10 health IT security points to remember

National Harbor, Md.—When it comes to data breaches in healthcare, learn from the mistakes of others. That was the message during a presentation on IT security at the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) 2015 annual meeting.

That and don’t share your passwords.

Helen Oscislawski, Esq., of Oscislawski LLC, gave a list of the top 10 IT security concepts to remember, peppering the presentation with tales of things gone terribly wrong. Big breaches, such as when hackers nabbed information on potentially 80 million Anthem health plan members, grab the headlines, but smaller scale breaches of security can have serious consequences for providers and patients. Oscislawski shared the story of one health care worker who allowed a friend to use her system credentials to snoop on the records of a patient. This patient was dating the snooper’s son, the story got out, and logs of access using the login credentials meant there was nowhere for either party to hide.

With that setting the stage, here’s Oscislawski’s top 10:

10: HIPAA Security Audit —This federal regulation (45 CFR 164.306) provides specification on the technical, administrative and physical specification of implementing security standards. It can help evaluate the likelihood and impact of risks to electronic protected health information (ePHI), but Oscislawski stressed that this audit should be an ongoing process that is updated in response to change, not a “one-and-done” event. “This is a good place to start to wrap your head around what is required of you,” she said.

9: HHS Resolution Agreements —Here’s where you can see enforcement examples and learn from the mistakes of others. Oscislawski noted that There have been 25 settlements over the last seven years, and that the amount collected in the last 12 months ($7.7 million) was a nearly double the preceding year (just under $4 million).

8: Big Breaches —Another chance to learn from the mistakes of others. Don’t just shake your head at the news of breaches like the one at Anthem or Premera Blue Cross (which potentially affected 11 million people), follow the stories, learn what went wrong, and make sure your organization doesn’t fall into the same trap.

7: Business Associates —Access for business associates is difficult to manage, but essential to control, said Oscislawski. Learn who has the authority to contract with a business associate and make sure contractual language follows HIPAA standards to shift responsibility and liability.

6: Social Media & the Internet —Today there is a blurred line between physicians and their patients or their friends when it comes to communicating through social media. Make sure you don’t make any missteps, reveal too much personal information or share images that aren’t deidentified (even if you think you’ve wiped protected info from a personal photo you’ve snapped in the office, zoom in and make sure there’s no patient information visible in the background).

5: No Snooping —No favors for a friend and don’t let curiosity get the best of you when it comes to information on patients you aren’t caring for.

4: Email and Texting —Consumer email services like Gmail and Yahoo are unsecure, as is traditional text messaging. There are HIPAA-compliant texting and Direct Messaging solutions. Use those instead.

3: Encrypt —Encryption is a safe harbor, says Oscislawski. One of the focus areas for the Department of Health and Humans Services (HHS) and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) encryption and stolen or lost laptops. “If the device is not encrypted, if it’s not configured for encryption…it shouldn’t be housing ePHI,” she said.

2: Report Breaches —Internal reporting is critical, and failing to discover breaches or reporting them late to HHS can have consequences. “The date upon which an employee gains knowledge of a breach or a security incident starts the time ticking for when [the organization] has to report that to HHS,” cautioned Oscislawski.

1: Educate and Train —An organization’s culture flows from the policies and processes that are in place. Make sure to train employees, post security reminders and stay on top of the latest hacker strategies, such as new phishing scam techniques.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1KEiMWs



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1cpCFBH
via IFTTT

The Health Care Industry Needs to Start Taking Women Seriously

What is the greatest impediment preventing Americans from getting good health care? Surprisingly, it’s not the cost of care. Instead, according to new research from the Center for Talent Innovation (CTI), the fundamental issue is the health care industry’s failure to develop a nuanced understanding of, and commitment to, women as consumers and decision makers.

According to our report The Power of the Purse: Engaging Women Decision Makers for Healthy Outcomes, which was based on a multi-market survey of 9,218 respondents in the U.S., UK, Germany, Japan, and Brazil, health care consumers are overwhelmingly female and have huge unmet needs. For women, time is at a premium — 77% don’t do what they know they should do to stay healthy because, according to 62%, they lack the time. Women are swimming in health information but don’t know which sources to believe: 53% think they can get the best health information online while only 31% of these women trust online sources. Not only are women starved for resources, but they don’t trust the professionals who try to serve them. Of the women surveyed, 78% don’t fully trust their insurance provider, 83% don’t fully trust the pharmaceutical company that makes their medicine, and 35% don’t fully trust their physician.

Without the time, information, and trusted relationships that inform good decision making, we found more than half (58%) of women surveyed lack confidence in their ability to make good health care decisions for themselves and their families.

These findings should be a huge cause for concern among all players in the health care industry. Women account for a significant chunk of the market. Fifty-nine percent of women in our multi-market sample are making health care decisions for others. That number shoots up to 94% among working mothers with kids under 18. These women set the health and wellness agenda for themselves and their families, choose treatment regimens, and hire and fire doctors, pharmacists, and insurance providers. Given the influence of these consumers, you would expect that the health care industry would be supporting them with tools and services.  Yet, strapped for time themselves, many doctors focus on patients to the exclusion of the decision maker accompanying them to the exam room; drug trials continue to ignore sex differences in medical trials and the impact that may have on dosage; and much information about insurance policies continues to be confusing and, at times, opaque.

The good news: By engaging this market segment and rebuilding trust, health care companies can have a first-mover advantage. They must first develop gender smarts with customers and exhibit the behaviors women seek, as decision makers, to serve their needs. As part of our study, we uncovered the behaviors that make the biggest difference in building trust and satisfaction with women:

  • Doctors can foster dialogue and provide clear communication. Reporting test results in an understandable way, openly discussing preventative care, and proactively managing the health of women and those they make decisions for, as well as providing them with information that help them make those decisions, all go a long way toward creating a trusted partnership.
  • Insurance companies can provide the coverage women want by making preventative care affordable, making it easy to find doctors in-network, and by providing easy, friendly, informative customer service. These seem like no-brainers, but in our interviews and focus groups, women continually report these provisions absent in their own relationships with insurance providers.
  • Pharmaceutical companies can win trust by ensuring that clear and comprehensive information accompanies prescriptions and is available both online and by telephone, and by providing gender- and ethnic-specific drug recommendations.

Next, health care companies can see an instant benefit from both putting women in positions of leadership and encouraging them to use their personal experiences and perspectives to shape their approach. After all, women comprise 88% of the health care workforce — but only 4% of health care CEOs. In our report, we uncovered story after story of female health care professionals who use their personal experiences as a family health decision maker to inform their work. Those who have found their way to leadership positions, or who work within forward-thinking organizations, have achieved incredible connections to the female market.

Consider Cleveland Clinic family doctor Lili Lustig, who felt ignored by the physicians treating her mother’s illness and now uses that experience to inform her own approach with patients and female decision makers in the low-income neighborhood where she works. “I am so driven to make a difference, because I understand their frustrations and desires to be taken seriously,” Lustig says. If a patient visits with a family member, she makes sure to treat both with dignity.

Or consider Meredith Ryan-Reid, MetLife senior vice president and mother of two, who draws upon a standout customer service experience she had when she ordered supplies from Diapers.com to inform her contributions at work. After all, it’s directly relevant as MetLife works to ensure its customer service operation is sensitive to the time limits, information needs, and confidence of its accident and critical illness customers — the majority of whom are women.

“It is so complicated for the health care industry to move to a new model,” says Lynn O’Connor Vos, CEO of Grey Health care Group. “Understanding the role and importance of [these female decision makers] can really help get us there faster.”

The more health care companies elevate and amplify women inside their organizations — and build trust with them externally — the better positioned they are to become truly consumer-centric. The roles women play in the lives of others lend a multiplier effect. Their role as decision maker is not receiving the notice or respect it deserves, which is why we have named the women in this market segment the “Chief Medical Officers” of their families. Developing a keen understanding of these women’s wants and needs in health care, and using that understanding at every stage of product development and commercial relations, will help companies uncover and leverage huge market opportunities as well as surprise and delight their customers.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1FKpXYZ



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1K0Ksne
via IFTTT

Friday 29 May 2015

Providers Unprepared For Revenue Cycle Changes

Task Force finds RCM ‘ill-equipped’ for the challenges of today’s healthcare marketplace.

A report from the HIMSS Revenue Cycle Improvement Task Force has found, “Revenue Cycle Management (RCM), as it exists today, is ill-equipped to handle the market forces impacting healthcare,” adding the current approach of “bolting on” new technologies and reworking existing processes will not suffice to address the current challenges of healthcare revenue management. “Rapid growth in consumer payments, reduced payer reimbursement rates, an ever changing regulatory environment, and shifting consumer expectations have all contributed to the challenges facing RCM,” write the report’s authors.

The task force gathered input from experts in order to provide an overview of the state of RCM in healthcare today as well as a blueprint for the consumer financial experience of the future and how it affects stakeholders. According to the report, members will focus on solutions in 2016.

Historically, healthcare providers have designed revenue cycle systems around business-to-business models that communicate with and collect payments from government and commercial healthcare insurance companies (payers). However, the healthcare marketplace is increasingly shifting to consumer-directed healthcare (CDH), and in the wake of the ACA, providers are now ill-equipped to efficiently handle the dramatic increase in consumer payments.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates out-of-pocket expenditures for consumers will total $420 billion, up 68 percent since 2007. As more provider revenue comes from patients, providers must engage in industry-wide collaboration to create a new revenue cycle model that puts consumers and quality care at the center of the RCM process.

The report also recognizes payers are not immune to the new financial dangers, noting, “If providers are unable to find a way to improve their collection of consumer payments, the increase in consumer payments is expected to lead to an increase in bad debt rates, putting increased financial pressure on providers. This could translate to a demand for higher reimbursement rates from payers.”

The HIMSS Revenue Cycle Improvement Task Force created an infographic illustrating its vision for the Patient Financial Experience of the Future, focused on tools and processes that keep administrative cost containment, interoperability and consumer engagement front and center, regardless of the reimbursement methodology being applied.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1FeYICu



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1KD32mO
via IFTTT

Demi Lovato speaks out on mental health issues

Pop star Demi Lovato is speaking out about her struggles with mental health issues, and encouraging others to do the same.

Five years ago, the singer-songwriter checked herself into rehab after an incident where she was accused of punching a back-up dancer while on tour with the Jonas Brothers. The then-18-year-old underwent therapy for eating disorders, depression and cutting and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

“Getting a diagnosis was kind of a relief. It helped me start to make sense of the harmful things I was doing to cope with what I was experiencing,” Lovato writes on bphope.com, an online community to raise awareness about bipolar disorder.

This week she announced a joint campaign with five mental-health advocacy organizations called Be Vocal: Speak Up for Mental Health to encourage people living with mental health issues to advocate for themselves and advance mental health support in America.

“In the United States mental health isn’t taken as seriously as physical health care so I’m making it a point to try and change that, in whatever I can do,” Lovato told News.com.au in an interview.

Along with encouraging individuals to speak up about their condition, the campaign is also urging patients to work with elected officials and community leaders to advance mental health care in America.

Bipolar disorder is a brain disorder that causes rapid, uncontrollable shifts in mood, energy and activity levels. Symptoms may be severe and can result in self-destructive behavior and damaged relationships at work, school and home.

One in four adults experiences some type of mental illness in a given year. Yet, nearly “60 percent of adults and almost one-half of youth ages 8 to 15 with a mental illness received no mental health services in the previous year,” according to the National Alliance of Mental Health.

Lovato joins other celebrities who have opened up about their struggles with mental illness in the hopes of making it less stigmatized in America.

In 2013 Catherine Zeta-Jones entered a mental health facility to seek treatment for bipolar disorder. Creed frontman Scott Stapp entered rehab last fall and is currently taking medication for bipolar disorder and participates in a 12-step program to deal with his drug and alcohol abuse. This past January, Glenn Close opened up about her family’s troubled past on “CBS This Morning.” The award-winning actress and her sister Jessie also launched a campaign to raise mental health awareness campaign.

Lovato celebrated three years of sobriety this past March and is continuing treatment for her condition. She says she hopes to continue to be a role model to kids and adults in America and around the world.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1BrF7hD



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1BuPKQL
via IFTTT

How the VA addresses medical device security

The Department of Veterans Affairs uses a two-pronged “defense in depth” strategy to secure its systems, including its networked medical devices, according to an article at HealthcareInfoSecurity.

The VA had about 65,000 medical devices on its network at last count in April, yet only two currently infected with malware, CIO Stephen Warren recently told reporters.

Warren pointed out the two key aspects of the VA’s efforts to keep medical devices clean:

  • Clear delineation of responsibility between the two groups responsible for medical devices: the biomedical staff, which helps safeguard devices in use at its sites, and Warren’s information systems team, which ensures data is flowing where it should, yet protects it at the boundaries.
  • Addressing the human factor: It looks for pathways to infection and locking devices down with processes and controls.

With the Food and Drug Administration’s recent warning about the vulnerabilities in computerized infusion pumps and the news from the Ponemon Institute that criminal attacks currently are the leading cause of data breaches, healthcare organizations now more than ever are concerned about securing medical devices. Security experts have said that these devices used in hospitals increasingly are riddled with malware, potentially providing criminals with a way into the network–not to mention posing safety threats to patients.

The VA has identified USB drives used by vendors to update software as one route to infection. It also makes sure vendor technicians aren’t surfing the web through medical devices’ network connectivity; VA staff aren’t allowed to do so, either.

“It’s important to put the discipline and controls in place to make sure that people don’t do silly things that end up causing significant damage to those medical devices,” Warren said.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1GIocNV



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1HAZr2l
via IFTTT

Norfolk and Suffolk mental health funding plan prompts dispute

Health Information Exchange Reduced Radiology Exams by 47%

The healthcare sector’s investment in EHR and health IT implementation as well as the expansion ofhealth information exchange (HIE) throughout the nation may be showing positive results. The goals of HIE developments are centered on reducing redundant testing, reigning in skyrocketing healthcare costs, and improving patient care.

Over the last 10 years, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) awarded as much as $548 million in grants to states toward the development of health information exchange platforms throughout each region. While reducing redundant testing and enabling easy access to key patient data are vital goals for HIE developments, what achievements has health information exchange gained over the last decade?Health Information Exchange

This is the exact question that Brookings Institution fellow Niam Yaraghi attempted to uncover in his research. Essentially, Yaraghi tried to find out if health information exchange platforms are effective and whether they are returning on the financial investment the federal government put into the program.

The researcher looked at a health information exchange platform among two emergency departments in Western New York and considered the effects of accessing patient data through the HIE. The results from the Brookings Institution research shows that using a health information exchange led to a 25 percent decrease in the number of laboratory tests conducted as well as 26 percent drop in the amount of radiology examinations.

When looking at the second emergency care department, Yaraghi found that the number of radiology exams fell by a total of 47 percent after the implementation of the health information exchange platform.

After investing in HIE developments over the last decade, the federal government and healthcare sector is finally seeing a return on its investment within the health IT sphere. HIE expansion will play a strong role in improving EHR interoperability over the coming years as well as enhance the quality of healthcare services throughout the industry.

As previously reported by EHRIntelligence.com, Scripps Health and Sharp Healthcare are two organizations that will take part in joining a health information exchange network in San Diego. The move is thought to improve care coordination as well as provide healthcare professionals with quick and easy access to critical patient data.

Along with this news, the Delaware Health Information Network, the region’s HIE platform, recently welcomed Union Hospital to take part in its real-time access to patient data, according to the Cecil Whig publication. With patients who visit treatment facilities across the border of Maryland and Delaware, physician access to their medical records should lead to quality care improvements.

“Our patients are fairly fluid and dynamic, they frequently cross borders for treatment,” Anne Lara, Union Hospital’s Chief Information Officer, told the news source. “Previously, if they went to another Maryland facility, we have a great relationship with CRISP, so we could easily exchange a patient’s record. We took it a step farther though and said, ‘Wouldn’t it be great if a patient went to Christiana Hospital (in Delaware), their info was already in the database?’ The whole premise is that we want to make sure that providers of all sorts have the information that they need in real-time, so they can make the best possible treatment decisions for their patients.”

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1eDCnZU



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1eDClkK
via IFTTT

Fujifilm Expands Healthcare IT Portfolio at SIIM 2015

STAMFORD, Conn.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–(Booth#237) – FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. continues to expand its healthcare IT portfolio, and is taking Vendor Neutral Archive (VNA) into new areas with its latest acquisition of TeraMedica, Inc., by further enhancing the patient imaging record at the 2015 annual meeting of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) on May 28 – May 30 in Washington, D.C.

Fujifilm recognizes that VNA technology is becoming more important to the market,” said Jim Morgan, vice president of Medical Informatics at FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. “Healthcare institutions and market shifts have created larger networks of facilities. Large hospital groups are coming together, disparate PAC systems are more common, and the use of electronic medical records has created central repositories of textual information. But what hospitals also want is to create a single repository for all their imaging data, in addition to other items like lab reports.”

Today, VNA technology serves a growing number of forward-thinking healthcare enterprises around the world to realize the promise of truly integrated patient-centric healthcare. Achieving this across multiple health care applications as well as IT systems and providers, it plays a crucial role in placing healthcare enterprises on the road to meaningful use.

In addition to Synapse VNA, following is a summary of Fujifilm offerings:

The cornerstone of Fujifilm’s integrated solution is Synapse PACS. Two main goals – enhanced communication and optimized productivity for radiologists in any imaging environment – were the impetus behind its development.

The next generation of Synapse RIS, the most advanced Radiology Information System on the market today, will also be shown. Synapse RIS and PACS integrate seamlessly, allowing the radiologist to see scanned documents and history from within the PACS, and allowing the user to see images from within the RIS.

A VNA solution is not complete without an enterprise viewer capable of displaying all of the image types stored to the VNA, with the appropriate tools based on the viewing physician type or department, and ZERO PC requirements. Fujifilm will also showcase its Synapse Mobility Enterprise Viewer to expand VNA image access across entire health system.

For more information, please visit: www.fujimed.com.

About Fujifilm

FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. is a leading provider of diagnostic imaging products and medical informatics solutions to meet the needs of healthcare facilities today and well into the future. From an unrivaled selection of digital x-ray systems, to the Synapse® brand of PACS, RIS and cardiovascular products, to advanced women’s health imaging systems, Fujifilm has products that are ideal for any size imaging environment. The Endoscopy Division of FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. supplies high quality, technologically advanced FUJINON brand endoscopes to the medical market. FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc. is headquartered in Stamford, CT. For more information please visitwww.fujimed.com and http://ift.tt/1f2Z0Pn.

FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, Japan brings continuous innovation and leading-edge products to a broad spectrum of industries, including: healthcare, with medical systems, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics; graphic systems; highly functional materials, such as flat panel display materials; optical devices, such as broadcast and cinema lenses; digital imaging; and document products. These are based on a vast portfolio of chemical, mechanical, optical, electronic, software and production technologies. In the year ended March 31, 2014, the company had global revenues of $23.9 billion, at an exchange rate of 102 yen to the dollar. Fujifilm is committed to environmental stewardship and good corporate citizenship. For more information, please visit: http://ift.tt/1st9kc9.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1HSkoer



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1RvfPIF
via IFTTT

Mass hackings increasingly threaten the American healthcare system

Here’s a bit of bad news that’s guaranteed to get worse: Since the start of 2015, three major health insurance companies have discovered and admitted that hackers breached their customer-information databases.

In February, Anthem admitted that hackers had compromised the records of 80 million current and former Anthem customers dating back to 2004. In March, Premera Blue Cross admitted to a breach compromising 11 million medical and financial records dating back to 2002. And earlier this month, CareFirst Blue Cross/Blue Shield discovered a breach compromising up to 1.1 million customer records.

And remember: it’s almost certain that those were not the only three American health insurance companies to have been hacked, merely the only three to have discovered and admitted such security breaches.

Of all the many types of identity theft Americans must worry about, medical identity theft is arguably the worst of all. Consider: If criminals steal your bank account or credit card numbers, it’s fairly easy (albeit annoying and time-consuming) for you to cancel the contaminated accounts and switch over to new ones. Changing your Social Security number is far more difficult, but it can be done if absolutely necessary.

But you can’t change your health and medical history; if that information falls into untrustworthy hands, there’s nothing you can do to make it obsolete.

Life-threatening

Most identity theft threatens your financial well-being, but medical identity theft can threaten your very life. Earlier this month, the Ponemon Institute published a study (sponsored by the Medical Identity Fraud Alliance, or MIFA) focusing on medical ID theft cases in the United States. Ann Patterson of MIFA defined medical I.D. theft not merely as theft of medical records and related data, but “when someone uses someone else’s identity to obtain medical goods or services.”

Imagine someone steals your health insurance information and uses it to get health care for themselves: “Your medical identity is corrupted with the identity thief’s health information. So their blood type, their allergies, their diseases, their health conditions that are not accurately reflecting your health…. It is most certainly a life-or-death situation,” Patterson said.

However, the available evidence suggests that the hackers who broke into Anthem, Primera and CareFirst weren’t trying to score free medical care for themselves — security investigators familiar with those cases say that the available evidence suggests the hackers enjoyed backing from the Chinese government. (China’s government, however, denies any role in America hacking activities, and points out that hacking is illegal under Chinese law.)

Your child’s medical file

Yesterday, Larry Ponemon of the Ponemon Institute and Rick Kam of ID Experts, writing for the Dark Reading security blog, went so far as to suggest that “escalating cyberattacks threaten U.S. healthcare systems.”

(Indeed, when news of the Anthem hacking first broke, the security investigators who first suggested the possibility of Chinese-government involvement also offered an ominously plausible motivation for it: “The attack appears to follow a pattern of thefts of medical data by foreigners seeking a pathway into the personal lives and computers of a select group — defense contractors, government workers and others.” And CareFirst primarily serves customers in Washington, D.C. and its immediate suburbs — in other words, a region where a huge proportion of the population works for either the federal government or its various contractors.)

Even for hackers interested in money rather than medical care or political power, stolen healthcare and health insurance data is far more lucrative than stolen bank account or payment-card information. Jim Trainor, from the FBI’s cyber security division, talked about the black-market value of various types of stolen data bought and sold by identity thieves: “Credit cards can be say five dollars or more, where [protected health information] records can go from 20 say up to — we’ve even seen $60 or $70.”

And there’s another potential problem Kam and Ponemon didn’t mention: the possibility that the very concept of “Internet security” might be inherently impossible, even a contradiction in terms.

Remember the early days of the Internet, when it was often called the “information superhighway?” The Internet as we know it was designed with the explicit purpose of making it easier to share information, whereas “Internet security” seeks the opposite, making information harder (if not impossible) for certain people to access.

You can make it easier to share something, or you can make that something harder to steal – but if you try accomplishing both tasks at once, with the same tool, you’re setting yourself up for failure.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1PSuQH8



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1ACuFcd
via IFTTT

Why let good health go up in smoke?

The global tobacco epidemic kills nearly 6 million people worldwide each year. More than 600,000 of these are non-smokers dying from breathing second-hand smoke. There is a close relationship between cigarette smoking and cardiovascular diseasesSmoking kills. Tobacco use is the single-most preventable cause of death globally and is currently responsible for killing one in 10 adults. More than 80 per cent of these preventable deaths will be among people living in low and middle-income countries. Every cigarette takes away five minutes of one’s life. According to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), WHO and the Tobacco Institute of India there is one death every eight seconds in India directly related to smoking. In India, there are 250 million tobacco users, that is, about one in four. They constitute about  57 per cent of adult males and 3 per cent of  adult females.   About 17 per cent male and 9  per cent female smokers are in the age group of 13-17 years.  Around 50 per cent smoke bidis, while 36 per cent chew tobacco / gutka and most start smoking at the age of 15 years. Tobacco companies are dumping their stock in India, Indonesia and China  — which according to a World Bank Study are the only countries  which have had an increased consumption of tobacco. What is equally alarming is that the companies are targeting the young population to make them addicted – tobacco is as addictive as heroin! About 5,500 Indian children start smoking every day, joining the 4 million under-15 children who already use tobacco.

Effect on cardiovascular diseases

Tobacco abuse is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease, the blockage of heart arteries leading to a  heart attack. According to a WHO estimate, in developing countries, 35 per cent of all deaths related to heart and blood vessel disorders in the 35-69 years age group are related to smoking. The incidence of heart disease is three to five times higher in smokers than in non-smokers. People who smoke 20 or more cigarettes a day are twice as likely to have a heart attack as non-smokers. Their chances of dying of a heart attack are 70 per cent more than in non-smokers.How smoking affects the heart Cigarette and tobacco smoke, high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, physical inactivity, obesity and diabetes are the six major independent risk factors for coronary heart disease that you can modify or control. Cigarette smoking is so widespread and significant as a risk factor that the Surgeon General of USA has called it “the leading preventable cause of disease and deaths in the United States.”  Cigarette smoking increases the risk of coronary heart disease by increasing blood pressure, decreasing exercise tolerance,  promoting  the deposition of fat in the wall of the arteries by damaging the cells lining the  arteries    and increasing the tendency for blood to clot. The effect is cumulative — the more you smoke, the greater your risk. A person’s risk of heart attack greatly increases with the number of cigarettes he or she smokes.  People who smoke a pack a day have more than twice the risk of heart attack than non-smokers. Cigarette smoking is the most important risk factor for young men and women. It produces a greater relative risk in persons under age 50 than in those over 50. Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for stroke of the brain. It is equally important in causing blockage of the leg arteries leading to gangrene and amputation .One out of five stroke cases are attributed to smoking. The risk for brain haemorrhage is three to four times higher in heavy smokers, while stroke due to occlusion of a brain artery is 1.5 – 3 times more common in heavy smokers. Hardening of the arteries of the legs is one of the most dreaded complications of smoking. Smokers have a 16 times greater risk of developing peripheral vascular disease (blocked blood vessels in the legs or feet) than people who have never smoked. Over 95 per cent of the patients who have occlusions in the leg arteries are smokers. The blockage, if unchecked, leads to gangrene and amputation of limbs. Smoking is a major cause of respiratory ailments such as  lung cancer, chronic bronchitis, frequent pneumonia and respiratory failure. About 80 per cent of the deaths from respiratory diseases are attributable to smoking. Lung cancer accounts for 15 per cent of all cancers in India. Smoking also increases the risk of cancer of the larynx (voice box), mouth cavity, and  oesophagus (food pipe).

Passive or secondhand smoke

The link between second-hand smoke (also called environmental tobacco smoke) and disease is very strong and is a major cause of  cardiovascular-related disability and death in non smokers. Some teens, especially girls, start smoking because they think it may help keep their weight down. The illnesses that smoking can cause, like lung diseases or cancer, do cause weight loss — but that’s not a very good way for people to fit into their clothes!  Smoking is expensive. Not only does smoking damage health, it costs an arm and a leg (actually literally – as it can lead to amputation ).  One of the goals  of the WHO has been  to encourage governments to raise taxes on tobacco to  reduce its consumption. How can quitting smoking be helpful?  Quitting smoking  helps to  prolong a healthy  life, reduces  risk of disease, (including heart disease, heart attack, high blood pressure, lung cancer, throat cancer, emphysema, ulcers, gum disease and other conditions), improves health and looks (Quitting can help you prevent face wrinkles, get rid of stained teeth and improve your skin). It improves the  sense of taste and smell and saves money . The main campaign of the WHO in this year’s World No Tobacco day (May 31, 2015) is targeted at the illicit tobacco trade. All forms of tobacco — cigarettes, pipes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco — are hazardous. It doesn’t help to substitute products that seem like they’re better for you than regular cigarettes, such as filter or low-tar cigarettes.    Nicotine in tobacco is responsible for the addictive nature of tobacco. It stimulates the nervous system and the heart . It causes the ‘lift’ experienced seconds after a puff. Stimulation of the nervous system may produce a temporary state of alertness but chronic use leads to a state of over-excitation, lack of sleep, irritability, tremors and nervous exhaustion. Nicotine  increases the heart rate by 15 – 20 beats per minute, can cause palpitation , and increases the blood pressure by 10-20 mm Hg within three to five seconds of a puff. Smoking is a slow but sure killer. Indian cigarettes and bidis have a very high nicotine content. Except for the fact that it is addictive, makes you sick and hastens your death, nicotine is a wonderful drug. Tobacco smoke also contains the deadly carbon monoxide and numerous other solid and gaseous chemicals. Tar is an aggregate of the particulate matter in cigarette smoke. Many chemicals in tar irritate the airway passage of the respiratory tract and stimulate production of sticky mucus, causing smokers cough and chronic bronchitis. Other chemicals in tar initiate and perpetuate various types of cancer. The present nationwide ban on smoking in the workplace is truly commendable and will  potentially prevent thousands of heart attacks and strokes. Such a ban also  substantially benefits nonsmokers who face risks from secondhand smoke. Smokers who quit or even just cut down on cigarettes can begin to reap the health benefits within a few months. Individuals who gradually quit smoking get improvements in risk factors for heart disease, including lower cholesterol and carbon monoxide levels. It is never too late to stop smoking. The benefits begin as soon as you stop. Staying smoke free will give you a whole lot more of everything— more energy, better performance, better looks, more money in your pocket, and, in the long run, more life to live!

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1FekLcx



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1J8oek6
via IFTTT

Public Health rises to demand

Kittitas County Public Health is an agency that responds when a need arises.

It faces a future where the need may rise and remain.

Traditionally the need involves an emerging public health concern (infectious diseases, food-borne illness, etc.), but in the coming months and years it may be responding to more consistent needs in the community.

Robin Read, the county’s public health administrator, and Dr. Mark Larson, county public health officer, said changes driving a potential increase in need for public health services are coming at the federal, state and local level.

“We are seeing direct and indirect impact on the services we provide here,” Read said.

Read said the changes on the federal level stem from the Affordable Care Act and it is too early to determine which direction that will go.

Under the Affordable Care Act, Read said more people will have health insurance.

“As more people get health insurance, we’re not sure what will happen. Will it overwhelm the health care system?” Read said.

If there are more patients than providers, people may turn to public health for services such as vaccinations. But if the private/public sector meets the needs, public health may not see an increase.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions at this moment,” Read said.

One potentially significant development at the health department is how it bills patients’ insurance companies for service provided. Read said the health department is going through the learning curve with billing insurance companies.

“Insurance billings are very complicated,” Read said. “There are a lot of tricks to learn.”

Ups and downs over the years

The department is a health services provider — immunizations, travel and tuberculosis management. Larson said that role has waxed and waned over time, and in recent years some of those duties have been cut back as the private sector took up the responsibilities.

“Doctors in the community have been absorbing patients who need those services,” Larson said.

That trend may now be shifting as the provider situation changes locally.

“We at the health department may need to ramp up services, mostly related to immunizations,” Larson said.

Where public and private meet

Larson is in the unique position of being a KVH-employed physician, who in some situations (in his role as county health officer) can tell the hospital what to do.

“For example, I’m the person who tells the hospital when to pull the trigger on masking their employees who do not get the flu vaccine,” Larson said.

In terms of practical application there is a good working relationship between the health department and KVH, he said.

Part of that is because several health department employees now work at KVH.

“We (health department) are well aware of what’s happening at the hospital partly because much of the leadership there used to work at public health,” Larson said.

In good shape

Larson said the Affordable Care Act is an endorsement of the public health model.

“The fee-for-service model to keeping people healthy is really a public health model,” Larson said.

While the act may tip its cap to public health, it doesn’t tip its coffers — no additional money is allocated to public health.

“They’re always cutting funding to public health,” Larson said.

Read said if the Affordable Care Act achieves its goal of improving health, then there will be health care savings for insurance companies.

“If that happens we will need to make sure that is reinvested in community health systems,” Read said.

The way public health may access additional funds, Larson said, is through partnerships with the hospital and with school districts.

But, he emphasized, public health in Kittitas County is in good shape.

“It’s strong, stable and supported by the county commissioners,” Larson said. “Public health is not going away because it’s work that no one else is going to do.”

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1ACixYw



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1d3EBk6
via IFTTT

U.S. health care reform should focus on prevention efforts to cut skyrocketing costs.

We know volume is not the same as value. Americans spend over $3 trillion a year on health care but have shorter life expectancies and higher rates of infant mortality and diabetes than our global peers.

It turns out our behaviors – shaped by our physical and social environments – are the primary determinants of health and well-being. And when it comes to health, the old trope is true: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Prevention can reduce the risk factors that lead to chronic diseases, slow their progression, improve overall health and reduce health care spending. Taking a prevention-first approach reaps benefits in the workplace as well: An unhealthy population leads to higher rates of absenteeism and presentism. In fact, the annual costs related to lost productivity due to absenteeism totaled $84 billion in 2013, according to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.

In order to refocus on wellness, over the past year, the Bipartisan Policy Center convened a Prevention Task Force to determine how to change our nation’s health conversation so we are taking actions to promote wellness rather than focusing solely on providing reactive medical treatment after a person gets sick.

Today, the task force is releasing recommendations for achieving this goal, which include better connecting clinical providers and community organizations, and creating incentives to make preventive care a priority. As senior advisers to the task force, we strongly endorse the two-part framework today’s report outlines to more fully integrate prevention into the nation’s approach to health and health care.

First, we must document the ways prevention works to build healthier communities. We often hear stories about how changes in health policy can result in healthier individuals, but we need data to back up the anecdotes. With data in hand, health care providers, insurers, federal, state and local governments and non-profit organizations can determine what community-level interventions produce statistically significant results and provide value for the investment.

The YMCA’s Diabetes Prevention Program is a working example. YMCA-trained lifestyle coaches administer a one-year, group-based intervention promoting healthy eating and physical activity for individuals with pre-diabetes. Program results found participants lost 5 percent to 7 percent of their body weight, significantly reducing their likelihood of developing type-2 diabetes. These data incentivized 30 different commercial health plans to cover the cost of the YMCA program because the costs of the program were far less than the cost of covering a diabetic patient.

To further the creation of evidence-based solutions like the YMCA program, we recommend that the federal government – including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Congress, as well as other public and private stakeholders – support research and programs that include robust economic analyses to explore how public health interventions and prevention strategies have worked. For instance, clinical and public health funding opportunity announcements could require economic models and federal programs, such as the CDC’s Community Preventative Services Task Force, which reviews and identifies successful community interventions, to be adequately funded.

Second, we also encourage stakeholders to find near-term opportunities to embed prevention in broader health care delivery system reforms.

Our current fee-for-service system does not offer specific compensation for health care providers helping patients to make changes to improve their health. It also has few structural or financial mechanisms to connect health care providers to their broader communities. This is unsustainable because diet, exercise, smoking, substance abuse, violence and environmental conditions have a greater influence on health than treatments and pills.

Thankfully, the U.S. health care system is in the early phases of a transformational shift from fee-for-service to value-based care. There is now a growing awareness of the link between high rates of chronic disease and rising health care costs. The Affordable Care Act created the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test innovative payment and patient care models to identify ways to improve quality while slowing cost growth.

We have already seen new accountable care organizations pioneer more holistic approaches to wellness. In Hennepin County, Minnesota, an accountable care organization links clinical and social services by providing beneficiaries with care coordinators, while implementing electronic health records across all the organization’s service entities. This approach can reach individuals before they walk through the doors of their doctor’s office or the emergency room. It can begin to address some of the key indicators of health outcomes, such as levels of physical activity, diet and tobacco use. We recommend the CMS integrate population health care quality measures into the next iteration of accountable care organizations.

We also encourage the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to invest in a robust demonstration of an accountable health community model, a newer variation of the accountable care organization that is explicitly focused on the health outcomes for a population within a geographic area using community-based interventions. This could establish a concrete framework for improving population health while leveraging the existing delivery-system infrastructure.

Over the next year, the task force will continue to engage targeted stakeholders and decision-makers in the public and private sectors in hopes of bringing about fundamental changes in the way we deliver health and value it. We hope these conversations will help bridge the gap between health care in the clinical setting and the powerful tools in our communities.

We need a more integrated, prevention-centric approach to health and health care if we truly want to help Americans enjoy longer, healthier and more productive lives. Changing the system won’t be easy and it won’t happen overnight. But better health, better health care and lower health costs are goals we all can embrace for the good health of the country.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1QdpX6l



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1G7cPAt
via IFTTT

Thursday 28 May 2015

EHR Interoperability Solutions Progress in Healthcare Sector

EHR interoperability is the name of the game, as healthcare providers and health IT vendors begin to realize the importance of connecting systems and medical devices to better communicate and share data throughout a medical organization.

National Coordinator for Health IT Karen B. DeSalvo has mentioned time and time again the need for EHR interoperability throughout the healthcare sector in order to ensure all physicians and healthcare professionals are able to access key data when making vital clinical decisions. Additionally, payers, patients, and hospitals will need the ability to view necessary health information to create a healthier population around the nation.EHR Incentive Programs

The Brookings Institution released a policy brief several months ago calling for fixing some of the issues and challenges within the health IT industry including the need for greater EHR interoperability and data exchange. Redundant testing and duplicative data entry would be solved with an increase in medical data sharing.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has gone forward with addressing the challenges and needs of the healthcare community with regard to improving EHR interoperability. From the ONC Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap to the report to Congressaddressing information blocking, this federal agency has put great efforts toward advancing EHR interoperability throughout the country.

Despite ONC’s efforts, according to Chief Informatics Officer Dr. John D. Halamka, there is an access of policy and political barriers to true health information exchange. Halamka states that the Massachusetts State Health Information Exchange (HIE) creates thousands of connections between hospitals and professionals throughout the nation with the help of Health Information Service Providers (HISPs).

The CIO goes on to say the EHR interoperability has a “positive trajectory” and that there is currently sincere progress taking place in boosting health data exchange. More importantly, Halamka states the importance of continuing efforts, identifying gaps in EHR interoperability, and solving these issues. Moving forward is the only real option.

Analysis from the research market firm Frost & Sullivan shows that interoperability and connecting healthcare tools is not uniform around the globe. In order to fix this issue, stakeholders will need to address connectivity standards and create a “digital healthcare strategy” that can connect vital medical devices in efforts to improve care coordination.

“More than 50 percent of healthcare providers do not have a healthcare IT roadmap, although they acknowledge the role of digital health in enhancing healthcare efficiency,” Frost & Sullivan Healthcare Research Analyst Shruthi Parakkal said in a public statement. “Consequently, even the existing interoperability standards such as HL7, DICOM and Direct Project are not being utilized optimally by many providers.”

Instead of requiring upgrading individual systems and investing funds in updating workflows, it would benefit hospitals and clinics if vendors developed products with guaranteed connectivity even when devices are developed by multiple manufacturers.

Parakkal also mentioned the importance of EHR interoperability in healthcare providers’ quest for successfully attesting to meaningful use requirements under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs and qualifying for financial incentives for adopting certified EHR technology. As CIO Dr. John D. Halamka mentioned, we must move forward in order to improve EHR interoperability on a national level.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1RrMuPA



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1clRGEF
via IFTTT

Five Population Health Use Cases for the Internet of Things

The Internet of Things, that loose conglomeration of internet-enabled mobile and monitoring devices, has found its place in the healthcare industry almost by accident.  Providers and developers looking for population health management solutions and better strategies for chronic disease care started to turn to wearables, smartphones, tablets, and home monitoring devices on an ad hoc basis to solve specific problems facing their patients and their bottom lines.

But as EHR adoption flourishes and healthcare’s fascination with big data analytics starts to become big business, these experimental forays into leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) for population health management and patient engagement are no longer a novelty.

The Internet of Things for population health management

The Internet of Things has become increasingly meaningful to healthcare organizations seeking more seamless, attractive, impactful ways to keep their patients happier and healthier on a larger scale.

What are some of the ways that healthcare organizations are using the Internet of Things to improve their population health management capabilities as the industry tries to balance consumer desires for innovative technology with smoother provider workflows and better outcomes?

Watching the rise of the wearable

Apple is pretty used to releasing disruptive mobile technologies by now, and despite its skeptics, the Apple Watch looks like it might be one of them.  The smart watch category has been staggering along as a consumer novelty for several years, but the wearable devices seem to have found a meaningful place in the healthcare industry thanks to HealthKit and ResearchKit, two projects that have already turned the wrist-top computers into Internet of Things superstars.

Academics have been enthusiastic over the big data analytics possibilities since the Marchannouncement of ResearchKit, which promised a rich, cloud-based playground of anonymized patient information that could be used for everything from diagnosis Parkinson’s disease to managing asthma and diabetes.

A few pioneering healthcare organizations have already jumped on the chronic disease management possibilities of the wearable devices, including Ochsner Health System in Louisiana.  As part of its population health management efforts, Ochsner is using the Apple Watch and Apple HealthKit, along with wireless blood pressure monitors supported by its Epic EHR infrastructure, to help patients maintain better control of their hypertension.

“Typically, hypertension patients see their physician a few times a year. Now, we are offering a new way to deliver care in patients with chronic diseases in which we can communicate with the patient in a more intimate way, more frequently,” said Richard Milani, MD, Chief Clinical Transformation Officer at Ochsner Health System.

“We recognize that to be impactful with this method, we need to fundamentally change behavior,” he added. “We can do this by providing continuous feedback with reminders and words of encouragement to promote lifestyle modification. What better way than to utilize the capabilities of the Apple Watch to make this an easier transition.”

Improving home monitoring for chronic diseases

Bringing continuous monitoring into the home setting is one of the most immediate benefits the Internet of Things has to offer.  As patients of all ages and technical abilities become more familiar with the basics of internet-connected consumer devices they are now using for a wide variety of routine tasks, healthcare providers are now able to extend their presence into the daily lives of patients without an insurmountably steep learning curve.

A recent study of diabetic patients that included the use of wireless blood pressure and blood glucose measurement devices, coupled with an internet-connected pillbox that transmitted data directly to participating primary care providers, clearly showed the potential for home monitoring devices to help patients keep their chronic conditions under control.

Patients who participated in the study rated the equipment easy to use, unobtrusive, and helpful for their ongoing care and organizational skills.  Providers dedicated relatively little time to the care coordination project, and found the resulting reports beneficial for tracking their patients’ progress and requested that the data be integrated into their EHRs.

Using patient-generated health data to fill in EHR gaps

Collecting meaningful and pertinent patient-generated health data has been one of the biggest challenges of the Internet of Things in healthcare, and remains a problem for providers already overwhelmed with the sheer volume of clicks and checkboxes involved in basic EHR use.  Aworryingly high proportion of providers have already taken a stand against an influx of new data that might complicate their workflows – how can they be convinced that data from wearables, mHealth apps, and other Internet of Things applications can have clinical value?

wearable devices and the internet of thingsIf patient advocates like Donna Cryer can’t convince providers that patient-generated health data is critical for better care coordination and improved patient engagement, value-based reimbursement certainly will.  As more and more revenue becomes dependent on patient satisfaction and patient outcomes, providers will need to heed the two-thirds of consumers who are adamant that mHealth data should be better integrated into their clinical care.

Smartphones and wearables are driving a major behavioral shift in consumer health and wellness,” said Gil Bashe, executive vice president of Makovsky Health. The company found that 79 percent of patients are interested in using some sort of wearable device to track their daily wellness metrics, especially if they had a specific chronic disease to worry about.  “Beyond a desire to speed access to information, consumers are using technology to engage proactively in managing their health. Savvy health marketers will apply these insights to engage and involve patients in more meaningful, customized ways.”

This patient-generated health data, collected passively by Internet of Things devices, has the potential to fill in the blanks inherent in EHRs, which have always been oriented to generate documentation of a specific episode of care.

“Using electronically collected patient-reported outcomes to capture the review of system outside of the clinic visit may not only improve the efficiency, completeness, and accuracy of data collection for the review of system, but also provide the opportunity to operationalize incorporating the patient’s voice into the electronic health record,” wrote University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill researchers Arlene E. Chung and Ethan M. Basch in a JAMIA article.

“Data rests at the heart of health IT’s capacity to help improve care quality and health outcomes: standards-based, interoperable electronic systems make it possible to access, share, use and re-use information that was once locked in paper charts kept by individual providers,” added representatives from the Office of the National Coordinator in January.

“As more and more consumers engage and adopt mobile health technologies to help them better track their daily health and wellbeing, it will be increasingly important to consider how those data can flow seamlessly from consumers to providers – and back – to help everyone achieve better health.”

Social media shows its worth for predictive analytics

Twitter may be better known as the forum of choice for celebrity feuds and pictures of restaurant dinners, but social media has proven to be a valuable tool for researchers looking to leverage big data from 140 characters or less.  Patients glued to their smartphones, the ultimate IoT devices, often mix in health-related complaints amidst their ordinary chit-chat, and data scientists are hard at work figuring out how those messages can be useful for healthcare organizations.

Thanks to the power of machine learning and sophisticated algorithms that can help extract meaning from seemingly mundane communications, Twitter is becoming a hotbed of big data analytics activity.  From identifying sleep disorders to interpreting the occurrence of adverse drug events, patients can provide a great deal of information into their health and wellness through social media and online search.

Providers may be able to directly benefit from these communications, as well.  Researchers at the University of Arizona are using a combination of keywords, time stamps, and location data from hundreds of thousands of tweets to chart potential emergency department usage among Twitter-savvy asthma patients.

The work has the potential to help model how and when asthma-related resources should be available in local emergency departments, says Dr. Sudha Ram, a UA professor of computer science and big data. “Interventions would be prioritized in time and place to reduce the risk for asthma ED visits,” she predicts. “For instance, public health resources could be used to reach out to patients from high-risk clusters or communities at any given time, and direct them towards less costly and more efficient care sites such as their primary care provider offices.

“Moreover, predicted risks could be spatially and temporally visualized, and made available to community stakeholders through various media sources,” she added, a resource that could be accessed through the same smartphones that generated the data in the first place.

Better device integration means better patient safety

The Internet of Things isn’t just a consumer-facing venture.  Providers are heavy users of mobile technology, too.  They rely on accurate, complete data from medical devices and secure messaging systems to keep them informed.  In the inpatient setting, the IoT includes laptops and computer workstations, bedside monitors, smartphones, tablets, and even implantable devices like pacemakers that beam data from inside the patients themselves.

Developers have struggled with the ability to ensure that the data from all these devices and tools can be synthesized and presented in a meaningful way, but healthcare organizations are increasingly making medical device integration a top priority for patient safety and care coordination.

“Our world is completely different today than what it used to be,”explained Amy Hester, PhD(c), BSN, RN, BC, Director of Clinical Informatics and Innovation at the University of Arkansas Medical Center, to HealthITAnalytics.com.  “Under the old way of doing things, it was possible for a patient’s vital signs to be 8 or 12 hours old by the time they were entered into the record.”

“It’s not like that anymore.  When we collect a set of vital signs or information from other devices like ventilators, that information is validated right there at the point of care.  It goes into the record straight away.  So everybody that needs to make care and treatment decisions about that patient has up-to-date, real-time information on that patient regardless of where they’re accessing that record from.”

“They don’t have to be on the unit.  They can be at home and access that information, or on their mobile device and access that information,” she continued.  “So our ability to have real-time access to data brings us into a whole new world now that we have our devices properly integrated.”

Whether intended for consumers or based in the ICU, medical devices are at the core of healthcare’s Internet of Things ambitions, and integration is the name of the game.  Data must be collected quickly and efficiently and presented in a meaningful, understandable way to its intended audience if it is to be useful for decision-making.

With population health management slated to become an increasingly pressing concern for providers shifting towards the financial risk involved in accountable care, the Internet of Things has already become a vital part of the industry’s efforts to meet the Triple Aim.  Wearables, smartphones, remote monitoring tools, and bedside devices that successfully combine into a seamless network of comprehensive patient data will provide newly actionable insights for healthcare providers seeking the best information available for clinical decision making and patient management.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1J8E24D



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1FjgXaU
via IFTTT

Party that wins latest Supreme Court case on Obama health law could face political downside

WASHINGTON (AP) — The party that wins the impending Supreme Court decision on President Barack Obama’s health care law could be the political loser.

If the Republican-backed challenge to the law’s subsidies for lower-earning Americans prevails, the GOP would have achieved a paramount goal of severely damaging “Obamacare.” But Republican lawmakers would be pressured to help the millions of Americans who could suddenly find government-mandated medical coverage unaffordable — and they’d face blame from many voters if they failed to provide assistance.

“If you win the case you actually have people who lost their insurance. You now share the responsibility for fixing it,” said former Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., who once led the House GOP campaign committee. “And you’ve got a lot of pissed off people. That hurts you.”

Should the Obama administration win, relieved Democrats would crow that Obama’s foremost domestic achievement had stood unscathed. But some say they’d have lost a potentially powerful cudgel for the 2016 campaigns: Being able to accuse Republicans of ending the assistance and disrupting health coverage for many.

If Democrats lose in court, “It completely reverses the issue and puts us back on offense on health care,” said Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., one of his party’s chief message crafters.

Democrats have frequently been forced to defend the 2010 law, including over Obama’s promise that people could keep policies they liked and the snafu-plagued startup of the federal HealthCare.gov website.

Not everyone thinks their party will lose politically should they win in court. Many Republicans say if the Supreme Court rules that subsidies were provided illegally, it would be the Democratic administration’s fault for doing so, not the GOP’s.

“That’s a win for us,” said conservative Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

One staunch defender of the law, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said a plaintiff’s victory would hurt both parties “because people across the country don’t always distinguish between the two sides.”

The Supreme Court decision is expected by late June or early July.

Conservatives and Republicans say the law’s wording limits subsidies to people buying coverage in states running their own insurance marketplaces. Thirty-seven states rely on HealthCare.gov, including 34 that would be most directly impacted if the court overturns the subsidies.

Democrats say the law was always intended to offer subsidies for all Americans who qualify.

According to government figures, about 8.8 million people have selected coverage from HealthCare.gov for this year. That includes 7.7 million who have qualified for subsidies, paid as tax credits, averaging $263 monthly.

The private Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Urban Institute have estimated that a plaintiffs’ victory would increase the number of uninsured people in 2016 by 8.2 million. The most heavily affected states are overwhelmingly run by GOP governors and are home to 22 of the 24 Republican senators facing re-election next year.

“If we’re not prepared with a transition plan, it could be difficult to sustain the pressure that would come to cover people who all of a sudden lost their subsidy,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the No. 2 Senate GOP leader.

Other damage could ripple through insurance markets, experts warn.

People who purchase coverage privately are in the same insurance pool as those buying from government-run networks. Many of the healthiest low-earning patients who lose subsidies would stop buying policies while many of the sickest would remain, boosting everyone’s premiums and potentially threatening entire insurance markets.

“You can just see the press on this and the events on this, people saying, ‘I had insurance yesterday and now I don’t,'” said Rob Jesmer, a Republican strategist.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1SCkM3Z



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1EAPmjV
via IFTTT

Most Health Care Providers Lack Health IT Roadmaps, Report Finds

A majority of health care providers acknowledge that health IT can improve care efficiency, but fewer than half have roadmaps for implementing such technology, according to a Frost & Sullivan report released Tuesday, FierceHealthIT reports.

Report Findings

The report found that providers:

  • Face cost barriers to managing various companies that offer connectivity between different communication protocols, devices and workflows; and
  • Have a pressing need for connected devices and health IT solutions to manage their data and qualify for incentive programs, such as meaningful use.

Under the 2009 economic stimulus package, providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs can qualify for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments.

In a release, Frost & Sullivan health care research analyst Shruthi Parakkal said, “Consequently, even the existing interoperability standards … are not being utilized optimally by many providers.”

However, the report noted that medical device makers offering connectivity functionalities often offer proprietary or closed gateways for connectivity. Because of this, manufacturers of open medical connectivity solutions that are vendor-neutral are seeing increased demand.

Still, the report found that partnerships aimed at sharing data are bolstering medical device connectivity, specifically with advances in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and radio frequency identification technology (Hall, FierceHealthIT, 5/26).

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1FFJObQ



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1dAezWA
via IFTTT

Heading on a New Mission, the Mother Ship of Health Philanthropy Wants More Answers

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is famously filled with research wonks and data fiends. And because this is a place always seeking a better empirical handle on things, it’s no surprise that it wants the best possible research on its side as it undertakes its mighty crusade to create a “culture of health.”

Or, to put things differently, there’s no way this foundation is going to be flying blind on the most ambitious mission it’s ever undertaken.

So it is that RWJF recently announced that it was laying out a whopping $25 million over three years for new health research. The money will go to fund “innovative research on policies, laws, system interventions, and community dynamics that improve health and well-being, with emphasis on sectors not typically associated with health, such as transportation and housing.”

That last part is interesting and shows the wide net this funder is casting to improve health, as other foundations are also doing these days. Looking “upstream” at how and where people live and go about their lives, national and state funders agree, is one key to finding new insights and solutions. But even as big funders like Kresge, Atlantic, and the Colorado Health Foundation spend millions in this area, RWJF is unique in the experience and capacity it brings to answering complex questions about how to improve population health. It’s the mother ship of health philanthropy, with $10 billion in assets, a visionary captain, and a long history of using evidence-based research to tackle many of the nation’s most difficult heath challenges. Now, as RWJF’s top data maven put it, ”we want to go even deeper to address root causes of inequitable health outcomes and possible solutions based in creative collaboration across sectors and disciplines.” That would be Alonzo Plough, chief science officer and vice president of research, evaluation and learning at RWJF.

The collaboration piece is key, and it’s likely that the foundation’s findings from this effort—assuming they’re noteworthy—are likely to offer guidance to a great many health funders, providers, community groups, and government agencies.

The new money will go to explore a range of questions that RWJF confronts as it seeks to advance a culture of health.

First, a big chunk will go to the University of California, San Francisco, to support different research efforts needed to build an overall evidence base for a culture of health. The foundation has talked about a lot of different strategies for improving health—from getting kids to walk to school to changing diets—and clearly it’s hungry for better answers on which avenues are the most promising to pursue.

Second, funds will go to Temple University to explore the “policies, laws and regulations in both the public and private sectors to support a culture of health.” As we’ve reported previously, for the past six years, Temple’s Public Health Law Research Program has worked with RWJF, looking at the regulatory dimension of health, so this new effort builds on existing work.

View the original content and more from this author here: http://ift.tt/1Fj2UlD



from health IT caucus http://ift.tt/1G3t69C
via IFTTT